<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kathleen O'Reilly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog</link>
	<description>Have you wondered what goes on in the head of a romance writer? Now you get the chance to find out.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:18:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Publishing Woe-begone by Maisey Yates</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=547&#038;cpage=1#comment-13663</link>
		<dc:creator>Maisey Yates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=547#comment-13663</guid>
		<description>Oh, thanks! I will!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thanks! I will!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Publishing Woe-begone by Kathleen O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=547&#038;cpage=1#comment-13653</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=547#comment-13653</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Maisey!  Those are some really nice words, and tell your CP good luck.  Blaze is a great line and I&#039;m happy to be there.  

I agree with you on good books.  I think it means that the gate-keepers will be so much more important.  It used to be that publishers were the final arbiters of what people will read, but now people will find the gate-keeper whose opinion they trust, and those books are the ones that will make somewhat more than $1.75.  

Congrats on the new release and if you see me in Orlando, (I won&#039;t be signing, but I&#039;ll be roaming the halls and haunting the bars), please holler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Maisey!  Those are some really nice words, and tell your CP good luck.  Blaze is a great line and I&#8217;m happy to be there.  </p>
<p>I agree with you on good books.  I think it means that the gate-keepers will be so much more important.  It used to be that publishers were the final arbiters of what people will read, but now people will find the gate-keeper whose opinion they trust, and those books are the ones that will make somewhat more than $1.75.  </p>
<p>Congrats on the new release and if you see me in Orlando, (I won&#8217;t be signing, but I&#8217;ll be roaming the halls and haunting the bars), please holler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Publishing Woe-begone by Maisey Yates</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=547&#038;cpage=1#comment-13650</link>
		<dc:creator>Maisey Yates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=547#comment-13650</guid>
		<description>Kathleen, I love your quote. :-) Good books will always be in demand, and not just anybody can write a really good book. 

But you can! Have to say, Sex, Straight Up is one of my favorite books. In fact, one of my CPs is aiming for Blaze and I mailed her a copy from Oregon to Melbourne so she could see an example of the best of the line. I&#039;ve also referenced the book on my website as an example of making someone care for a character in just a few paragraphs. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen, I love your quote. <img src='http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Good books will always be in demand, and not just anybody can write a really good book. </p>
<p>But you can! Have to say, Sex, Straight Up is one of my favorite books. In fact, one of my CPs is aiming for Blaze and I mailed her a copy from Oregon to Melbourne so she could see an example of the best of the line. I&#8217;ve also referenced the book on my website as an example of making someone care for a character in just a few paragraphs. <img src='http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Geeky Ways to Say by Kathleen O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=532&#038;cpage=1#comment-11164</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=532#comment-11164</guid>
		<description>comment test ignore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comment test ignore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Word Fun by Jinky</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=529&#038;cpage=1#comment-8525</link>
		<dc:creator>Jinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=529#comment-8525</guid>
		<description>I hate the word tweet in the same way I hate the word blog.  Blog.  Say it aloud.  It sounds like a social disease.  After 10 years, I finally acquiesced to the word blog, so I imagine when I&#039;m 40, I&#039;ll accept tweet, too.  But by then, there will be another, more ridiculous word out there I can&#039;t stand.  Like snoodle, or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the word tweet in the same way I hate the word blog.  Blog.  Say it aloud.  It sounds like a social disease.  After 10 years, I finally acquiesced to the word blog, so I imagine when I&#8217;m 40, I&#8217;ll accept tweet, too.  But by then, there will be another, more ridiculous word out there I can&#8217;t stand.  Like snoodle, or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kathleen Ellen Givens by Kathleen O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=521&#038;cpage=1#comment-7880</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=521#comment-7880</guid>
		<description>I know exactly what you mean, Sherri.  I was reading over the comments about how everyone had first met Kathleen, but I don&#039;t remember when I first met her.  I just sort of always knew her.  She was that sort of lady.  Friends from the get-go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know exactly what you mean, Sherri.  I was reading over the comments about how everyone had first met Kathleen, but I don&#8217;t remember when I first met her.  I just sort of always knew her.  She was that sort of lady.  Friends from the get-go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kathleen Ellen Givens by Sherri Browning Erwin</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=521&#038;cpage=1#comment-7879</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherri Browning Erwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=521#comment-7879</guid>
		<description>She was one of a kind. (she might think I was being sarcastic just then and give me the look, but I mean it in the absolutely special and irreplaceable way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She was one of a kind. (she might think I was being sarcastic just then and give me the look, but I mean it in the absolutely special and irreplaceable way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can&#8217;t smoyle without you&#8230;. by Kathleen O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=518&#038;cpage=1#comment-7878</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=518#comment-7878</guid>
		<description>doona and rort???  Kat, I had to go and google them.  How fun!  Aussie words are as much fun as British words, no rorting at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doona and rort???  Kat, I had to go and google them.  How fun!  Aussie words are as much fun as British words, no rorting at all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can&#8217;t smoyle without you&#8230;. by Kat</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=518&#038;cpage=1#comment-7816</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=518#comment-7816</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m miffed the Scrabble dictionary doesn&#039;t have doona and rort. Not high-value words, but words nonetheless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m miffed the Scrabble dictionary doesn&#8217;t have doona and rort. Not high-value words, but words nonetheless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can&#8217;t smoyle without you&#8230;. by Kathleen O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=518&#038;cpage=1#comment-7733</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/?p=518#comment-7733</guid>
		<description>According to Wikipedia, English scrabble has 1 Z, and SuperScrabble has 2, but then you get two blank tiles in basic Scrabble and 4 blank tiles in Super Scrabble, so theoretically, you could get two &#039;z&#039;s in regular scrabble and four in Super Scrabble.  

I made up a scrabble scene in my May book, and they have tons of E&#039;s and M&#039;s.  It was fun, and completely not based in Scrabble reality. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Wikipedia, English scrabble has 1 Z, and SuperScrabble has 2, but then you get two blank tiles in basic Scrabble and 4 blank tiles in Super Scrabble, so theoretically, you could get two &#8216;z&#8217;s in regular scrabble and four in Super Scrabble.  </p>
<p>I made up a scrabble scene in my May book, and they have tons of E&#8217;s and M&#8217;s.  It was fun, and completely not based in Scrabble reality. <img src='http://kathleenoreilly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
