For lovers of the skins of Moles

Caveat writer waiver: I have moleskins. I love moleskins. I do not like apricot jasmine tea. I have been known to prance.
clipped from www.theonion.com
SAN FRANCISCO—After gently unfastening the elastic strap keeping his dearest musings safe from prying eyes, little literary artiste Evan Stansky penned a few more darling thoughts into his clothbound Moleskine notebook Wednesday. “These are much higher quality than the notebooks you find at CVS,” lilted the auteur, who couldn’t be bothered to use—dare it be said—a journal of lesser craftsmanship or pedigree, or one not famously used by such legendary artists as van Gogh and Hemingway. “They’re a little more expensive, but I try to write on both sides so I don’t go through them as quickly.” At press time, the princely scribe was seen finishing his apricot jasmine tea, asking a mere mortal sitting nearby to watch his literary accoutrements, and then prancing off to the Starbucks powder room, light as a feather.
blog it

October 21st, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »


The Daily Show with Jon Stewart: Rape-Nuts

Ah, Congress, Congress, Congress… Why do you amuse me with your continual antics? Is there something in the oath of office that says, “I must give comedians fodder for jokes.”

more about "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart: Rape…", posted with vodpod

October 16th, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »


Miss Annie’s House of Beauty and …er, Death to America

Sometimes odd things crack me up.  You all might have noticed that I’ve been absent from like, EVERYWHERE. It’s because I’m like, you know, writing.  I’ll return more regularly in December, but I saw this today, and it’s making me laugh (in a dark way).  And most things that make me laugh I want to share.

So, you’ve seen the foiled terrorist plot to bomb NYC?  Well, MSNBC is reporting that the terrorist were hitting up beauty stores for hydrogen peroxide and nail polish remover.  Beauty supply?  Are you kidding?  First, we have flight schools, and now Al Queda is like, We will attack them where they curl up and dye

So, my mind starts to wander and I can see Crystal from Jersey who works at Miss Annie’s Beauty Supply, calling into the FBI.  “Listen, I got those guys, and frankly, it’s very freaky.  They’re buying us out of peroxide, and everybody knows that you can’t just go BLONDE when you’re that tan.  And nail polish remover! So I ask this bearded Joey, I’m saying, you should try a little something metallic on those nails, and he gives me this long glare, and I’m only trying to help, and he starts muttering something that I don’t understand, and I’m thinking, these are no fashionista here.  And later,  so I’m telling Carlo, and he says, they’re going to bomb us.  They’re going to take all those chemicals and bomb us to hell.  And I tell him that that’s just all that conspiracy theory crap and he’s been sniffing his paint for a little too long.  And he says to me, I swear to God, Crystal.  You gotta call it in.  And I told him I didn’t want to call it in, because I don’t want the FBI breathing down my posterior, as if this world doesn’t have enough Big Brother, but Carlo has got me thinking, and I talk to Dawneen and she’s giving me the look, and I think, could it be?  Have the terrorists infiltrated Miss Annie’s Beauty Supply?  And so here I am…. Hold please.”

So first of all, from a purely practical standpoint, am I going to have to submit my driver’s license every time I buy nail polish remover?  And the next thing, is OMG, this would make an AWESOME TV show!  It’d be like Law & Order, Natural Beauty Haircare and WMD Unit.  And all the cops would be all tough and serious, and all the beauty supply operatives would be popping their bubble gum and trying to make over all the lawyers?

I just needed to share.

September 25th, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in New York State of Mind | No Comments »


You say Balderdash, I say… Gibberish!

Nothing like new technology!

Nothing like new technology!

DailyWritingTips is a handy dandy little place to go to.  And as most of you know, I’m a word collector.  Yesterday’s post at DWT as words for…  nonsense words.  Any romance writer will have need to words to describe non-sense words, because in arguements between the sexes, there are myriad opportunities for the hero to puzzle at the heroine and think to himself…  “That’s just so much… insert nonsense word here…”    My favorite one is tripe, although I think it takes a certain sophisticate to use ‘tripe’ in an ordinary conversation.    And I can totally see a heroine, slack-jawed at the hero’s reasoning, thinking to herself:  “That’s a cock and nuts take on life if I ever heard it.”

September 10th, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »


Heh Heh Heh….

There are no words. From Gidmozo:
clipped from gizmodo.com

$130,000. That’s how much Waldo—an autonomous underwater robot from the Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Florida—costs. Now they have to find it, and the bloody thing doesn’t even wear a white and red striped sweater.

  blog it

September 8th, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »


Jane Friedman is one smart cookie….

Galleycat is covering the new Jane Friedman (ex-Harper Collins honcho) digital publishing venture. I think the idea of backlist titles in digital is HUGE. I’ve already mentioned this to a couple of people that there are a lot of established authors who have books that are out of print, or manuscripts tucked in drawers and there is a great opp for anybody that can facilitate getting the books pubbed easily and cheaply. It’s a win/win/win for authors, readers, and the publishers who are on the ball.
clipped from www.mediabistro.com

Here’s more from the article: “One house she has talked to is Kensington Publishing; a source says Friedman is interested in doing a deal with Kensington because of its extensive backlist of romance titles. ‘She seems to think romance is where the future is, and the money,’ says the source.”

  blog it

August 27th, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »


And we would have gotten away with it, if not for those pesky Twittering kids!

Aha!!! The mystery to Inglourious Basterds is solved! It’s not Brad Patt, it’s Twitter!!
clipped from mashable.com

Earlier this morning we reported that Twitter (Twitter) may have played a role in generating box office revenue for Inglourious Basterds. The so-called “Twitter Effect” has also been credited with sinking Bruno on day two and giving District 9 an added box office boost.

  blog it

August 24th, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »


At the Blaze Blog Today

I’m posting at the Blazeauthors blog today. Taking an informal survey on the whys of reading romance and has the why changed and why the why has changed….

August 24th, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in Blogroll, Reading Matters | No Comments »


Inglourious Basterds? Really? Really??

This week, the new Quentin Tarantino movie opened #1 at the box office, raking in $37.6M, which isn’t blockbuster numbers, but I was surprised. For those who haven’t read the storyline, here’s the synopsis:

“Inglourious Basterds” begins in German-occupied France, where Shosanna Dreyfus(Mélanie Laurent) witnesses the execution of her family at the hand of Nazi Colonel Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz). Shosanna narrowly escapes and flees to Paris, where she forges a new identity as the owner and operator of a cinema. Elsewhere in Europe, Lieutenant Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) organizes a group of Jewish soldiers to engage in targeted acts of retribution. Known to their enemy as “The Basterds,” Raine’s squad joins German actress and undercover agent Bridget Von Hammersmark (Diane Kruger) on a mission to take down the leaders of The Third Reich.

So, I’m thinking, is it:
a) World War II – Nazi evil, die suckah!
b) Brad Pitt
c) Quentin Tarantino
d) everything else sucked and people really wanted to see a movie

I really did love Pulp Fiction, but I’m thinking d) on this one. We watched Defiance a couple of weeks ago, and I’m sorry, but I’ll take Daniel Craig and Liev Schreiber over Brad Pitt any day. Feel free to debate and discuss the artistic merits of BP vs DC and LS.

And also watched Sum of All Fears a couple of days ago, and I realized how energy Liev Schreiber brings to a role. Absolutely nothing to do with anything, but I noted it. :)

August 24th, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in Newsflash | No Comments »


Book Ads

Fast Company has a nifty little article on Amazon patents for embedded ads. Now, to be fair, the idea of ads at the beginning or the end, don’t bother me, and enough books have ads at the end (granted, for their own publishing house). However, I’m not sold on the idea of embedded ads, although they’re ubitiquous enough online, and I’ve learned to ignore them… However, one of the bits in the article fascinates me. The idea of an ad that relates to the text. Mention a restaurant, and that ad shows up on an opposing page (although what opposing page on a Kindle?)

However, think of what this means to somebody like Candace Bushnell. Mention Prada and you get an ad next to it. Mention the Waldorf and you get a coupon for a free night (I wish!). Or maybe the JR Ward books. Mention Nike and you get Tiger Woods in the middle of a battle with the Others.

And would authors get kickbacks? If I slip in say, Pepsi, rather than Coke, would Pepsi pay me for the placement? The business model for publishing is changing, and I’m curious where it will end up. Finger Licking Fifteen sponsored by KFC?

Just thinkin…
clipped from www.fastcompany.com

Amazon’s just filed a number of patents that point to the inevitable but perhaps undesirable expansion of advertising onto its much-vaunted Kindle e-reader. If it happens, would you tolerate in-book or in-magazine embedded ads?

  blog it

August 9th, 2009 Kathleen O'Reilly Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »